Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Archibald Knox and the British Interpretation of Art Nouveau


Illustration: Archibald Knox textile design 1900

Archibald Knox is probably rightly best known for his domestic metal work design pieces, and particularly for the work he produced for the retail outlet of Liberty. However, he was also involved in textile design work and some of the design work produced by him at the turn of the twentieth century, though it might not have had the same popularity as some of the main textile and wallpaper design work of the day, can still be seen as fine examples of not only a late Victorian decorative style, but an insight into the British interpretation of the new European Art Nouveau decorative style.

The Art Nouveau movement had managed to instil itself into many aspects of the decorative arts in large parts of Europe by 1900. However, Britain with its self imposed isolationist approach to the continent, was less than enthusiastic and at first tried to ignore the movement altogether, hoping that it was a transitory decorative effect that would have its moment and then fade, hopefully without the British decorative industry having to invest any time or money in the style.


Illustration: Archibald Knox textile design 1900

It became apparent as the 1890s gathered pace, that the decorative movement was not fading, and if anything was gathering strength as the decade progressed. The British could no longer ignore the style which was beginning to prove popular with elements of the general public, and therefore had to deal with the importation of yet another European decorative movement. However, the British have always had a tendency of changing and even developing decorative styles to suit their own needs and tastes, which is what they did with the Art Nouveau movement. While certain elements were swallowed whole, such as the sinuous and twisting effects that were such an integral part of Art Nouveau, and the dependence on the natural world as an inspiration, changes were made and these can be seen in part at least, in the examples of textile design work by Archibald Knox shown in this article.

All the designs were produced in 1900, which could probably be said to be the height of the Art Nouveau movement, and while they do follow the tenets of the French style, they do not follow it that closely. Knox has used the element of the sinuous curve not as a symbolic interpretation of the sensuous nature of the natural world, but as a genuine observation of the curve as seen in the natural world. Therefore we see the portrayal of the movement of water and the curve of a bird's tail feather. While the French system of Art Nouveau only allowed nature to play a secondary and supportive role to that of ornamentation and decoration, the version Knox and many other British designers used, allowed the observation of the natural world to play a much larger part in the design work, drawing closer similarities to the work and style of William Morris and the Arts & Crafts movement, rather than that of the French. Knox's portrayal of foliage, while paying a certain amount of homage to Art Nouveau and its new emphasis on style over representation, is still not convincing as a piece of Art Nouveau decoration in the French style.


Illustration: Archibald Knox textile design 1900

These pieces by Knox do not so much show the hesitancy or timidity of British tastes as compared to the French, but have much more to say about the British love of nature and its accurate and faithful portrayal within the realms of the decorative arts. Knox provided, with these examples of textile design work, a subtle but still rich example of decorative work that took some of the best elements of European contemporary design, diluted them and then wove them into the British tradition of placing the affection held for the natural world at the centre of decoration, rather than the periphery.

Britain's lukewarm approach towards the Art Nouveau movement should be seen within the context of a culture that had its own special relationship with nature, at least in the context of decoration, and that all subsequent movements would have to take that relationship into consideration if they were to succeed.

Reference links:
Archibald Knox
Designs of Archibald Knox for Liberty & Co.

8 comments:

lei said...

I am constantly amazed at the amount of inspiration and education I receive from your postings. Your blog has become my go-to source when I need to solve a problem or get a kick start on a new piece.

A simple thank you doesn't seem like enough but it's all I have to offer. Thank You!

Anonymous said...

damn shame. not enough art nouveau.
pansypoo

John hopper said...

Thanks very much for your comment Lei.

The Textile Blog was set up as both a source for information and inspiration and I try to make the blog as wide ranging, within the textile format, as I can, so that there is a mixture of the obvious subjects and the lesser known ones.

When I get a message like yours it makes it all seem worthwhile. Thanks!

John hopper said...

I think that I must be more British than I think sometimes, as I am sure that you can have too much Art Nouveau sometimes. I prefer the British watered down version myself, but then I would wouldn't I?

Hels said...

"The version Knox and many other British designers used allowed the observation of the natural world to play a much larger part in the design work, drawing closer similarities to the work and style of William Morris and the Arts & Crafts movement, rather than that of the French."

Very possible John. But isn't it also possible that the Art Nouveau movement succeeded in instilling itself into the decorative arts of "isolationist" Britain BECAUSE the more native arts and crafts movement was already in full bloom?

Victorian Cambridge Catholic Neo-Gothic was an architectural and decorative style that had probably run its run by the late 19th century. So you could argue that even if Art Nouveau had not grown up on the continent, Britain would have inevitably initiated its own art nouveau-ish style.

sorry for my incoherence here.. I had two separate themes running through my brain
Hels

John hopper said...

Elsewhere in this blog I have mentioned a number of times the role that the larger Arts & Crafts movement played in British decorative arts. For this article I just wanted to mention the fact that despite the homegrown Arts & Crafts movement, the British were not immune to contemporary decorative styles from the continent.

Art Nouveau was very much a studied and constructed decorative style, which had much more to do with its interest in a stylised, almost abstract interpretation of nature, rather than that of observation. The British however, tended to see nature from the perspective of acute observation, whether from an Arts & Crafts persepective or any other style. The article was to try to show that perspective, the fact that the British used the stylized nature of Art Nouveau, not to express any form of sensuality or cleverness of form, but to express the curves found in the natural world, hence the curvature of flowing water or that of a birds tail.

Archibald Knox is a particularly interesting designer as he could be said to have had a foot in each camp as he is often seen as both an Arts & Crafts designer and also as an Art Nouveau interpreter, especially for his Celtic/Art Nouveau metal work produced by Liberty.

I don't honestly believe that the British saw the French/Belgian version of Art Nouveau as having any real links or sympathy with their own Arts & Crafts style and many did see it as a foreign affectation with no sense of history and no grounding in reality. That it started to show up in muted form in Britain is interesting.

As to the decline of the Gothic Revival movement, that movement was always much more of a state funded decorative style, whether it was for government building projects or the Church of England which was always very much a state institution. Gothic had its heyday, but the inevitable Classical revival was always waiting in the wings and eventually did replace Gothic as the 'state style' and became more or less the late 'British Empire style'.

Gothic was never really as popular in Britain as a domestic decorative style, certainly not as popular as the Arts & Crafts, though we have to remember of course that the Arts & Crafts movement was always a loose confederation of individuals, groups and organizations at best, many of whom never saw themselves as having anything to do with any movement, and because it is more convenient for us to lump them altogether under one title today, does not mean that it was necessarily so at the time.

Anonymous said...

Great blog, good information on Archibald Knox and British Art Nouveau. For more information on AK please visit our society website.
www.archibaldknoxsociety.com
I will add a link to your blog
Regards
Liam O'Neill
Chairman AKS

John hopper said...

Thanks very much for your comment. I am a big fan of Knox and will be sure to include a link to your site in any future article on Knox that turns up on The Textile Blog, which of course is a certainty.

Post a Comment

Related Posts with Thumbnails